Orthodox Ethos

Top Banner Image

Orthodox Ethos | permalink source

October 11th, 2016

Demetrios Tselengidis: On the Surpassing Value of the Spiritual Unity of the Church, Its Brutal Abuse in Crete and the Identification of the Church with its Administration

Letter (Aug. 30, 2016) to the Archbishop and Hierarchy of the Church of Greece on the "Council" in Crete

The well-known and respected Professor of Dogmatic Theology at the Theological School of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Demetrios Tselengidis, has issued an important and timely three part analysis of the Cretan Council and the ecclesiological problems and issues surrounding it. The letter was sent to all of the hierarchs of the Church of Greece at the end of August and has been included in...

October 7th, 2016

Η Οδός και η Αλήθεια του Χριστού και η "Σύνοδος" της Κρήτης

Συνέντευξη με τον πρωτοπρεσβύτερο Πέτρο Χιρς, για το περιοδικό της Ι.Μ. Σαμταύρο, Μτσκέτα, Γεωργιας.

Συνέντευξη για το περιοδικό της Ι.Μ. Σαμταύρο, Μτσκέτα, Γεωργίας (τεύχος 3-4(24-25), Αύγουστος - Σεπτέμβριος, 2016, σ. 7-9).

*Ο Πρωτοπρεσβύτερος Πέτρος Χίρς (Δρ.Θεολ.) είναι εφημέριος του Ι. Ν. Προφήτου Ηλιού, Πετροκέρασα Θεσσαλονίκης, της Ιεράς Μητροπόλεως Ιερισσού, Αγίου Ορους.

October 7th, 2016


Interview with Protopresbyter Peter Heers, for the Journal of the Holy Monastery of Samtavro, Mtskheta, Georgia.

Interview conducted by the nuns of the Samtavro Monastery, for the Journal of the Holy Monastery, located in Mtskheta (Georgia), "Samtavros Makhvlovani," [trans. "The Blackberry Bush of Samtavro"], issues 3-4(24-25), August-September, 2016, pp. 7-9. [This is the monastery where the newly glorified holy ascetic, confessor and fool for Christ Saint Gabriel (Georgian: გაბრიელი), lived and reposed and where...

September 28th, 2016

The Decisions of the Hierarchy of the Church of Greece on the “Holy and Great Council” and the Final Outcome

By Metropolitan of Nafpaktos and St Vlassios HIEROTHEOS

Translated, for the Holy Metropolis of Nafpaktos and St. Vlassios, by Anastasios Filippides
September 14th, 2016

New Publication Dedicated to an Assessment of the Cretan Council

Three Extensive Analyses of the Council and Its Documents

A new publication in Greek examining the "Cretan Council" is now available on-line:


It contains three exceptional examinations of the pre-history, oŕganization and documents of the Council by Archimandrite Athanasius, the Pro-Igoumenos of Great Meteora, Archpriest Theodore Zisis, Professor Emeritus of Patrology at the Theological School of the University of Thessaloniki, and Professor Demetrios Tselengidis, Professor of Dogmatic Theology at the same theological school.

This is a "must" read for all Orthodox Christians and especially clergy and Hierarchs!

If anyone is able and interested in assisting in translating the texts into English and other languages, please contact us via email or Facebook or leave a comment below.

We will return to these important texts soon with excerpts.

September 12th, 2016

Scans of the Final, Signed Documents from the Cretan Council Available On-line

Copy of the "Relations" Text Reveals that many Hierarchs did not sign the document

The final versions of the texts produced at the Council in Crete have been made available on-line over at the theolcom.ru website. The text "Relations of the Orthodox Church with the Rest of the Christian World" will be of particular interest to many, for it shows that even more hierarchs than previously thought refused to sign the document. Out of 162 Hierarchs present, a total of 33 Hierarchs, or 1 in 5 (20%), did not sign the document, including 5 from the Patriarchate of Constantinople.

Of all of the Local Churches represented, the Patriarchate of Serbia stands out with 17 of the 24 hierarchs withholding their signature. With only 7 or about 30% in agreement with document, on what basis did the Patriarch of Serbia add his signature to the document? Given that the Primate's signature was supposed to express the consensus or at least the majority of his Church, is this not a glaring example of the absence of concilarity and the reign of a "papal" mentality? Where is the much vaunted concilarity for which the Cretan Council was called and incessantly hailed in official propaganda put forward by the Council's spokesmen?

Furthermore, when, in the history of the Church and General Orthodox Councils, was a document passed with such a large minority diagreeing and there being no break in communion or anathematizing by the majority? In other words, when did the Church ever allow for a differing stance on matters of Faith? To those who would say the text in question does not set forth doctrine or attempt to define dogma, the response is that the text is chalk full of dogmatic teaching concerning the Church, which is an object of faith in which we confess we believe. As Christ is inseparable from His Body, the Church, so too is Christology inseparable from Ecclesiology. What we believe about the Church directly reflects our faith in Christ. Hence, there can be no doubt that the Faith of the Church in Christ is at stake in the "Relations" text and there can be no compromises in matters of Faith.

The time for all bishops, and, indeed, all Orthodox Christians, and especially clergy, to take a stand and confess the Orthodox Faith in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church over and against the new heretical ecclesiology of ecumenism, clearly expressed by the "Relations" text, has come. May many more join the 33 who did not sign the unorthodox document and may they all together clearly and forthrightly set forth the Orthodox teaching on the oneness and holiness of the Church to their flock and the entire Church

Readers can find the English version here, and the Greek version here.

For your convenience, we have listed those who did NOT sign the text below, in order of their appearance in the text:

From the Ecumenical Patriarchate:

1. Isaiah of Denver

2. Nicholas of Detroit

3. Amphilochios of Adrianopolis

4. Antonios of Hierapolis, Head of the Ukrainian Orthodox in the USA

5. Gregory of Nyssa, Head of the Carpatho-Russian Orthodox in the USA

From the Patriarchate of Alexandria

6. Jonah of Kampala

7. Seraphim of Zimbabwe and Angola

From the Patriarchate of Jerusalem

8. Benedict of Philadelphia

9. Theophylaktos of Jordan

From the Patriarchate of Serbia

10. Amphilochios of Montenegro and the Littoral

11. Porfirije of Zagreb and Ljubljana

12. Vasilije of Sirmium

13. Lucian of Budim

14. Longin of Nova Gracanica

15. Irinej of Backa

16. Hrizostom of Zvornik and Tuzla

17. Justin of Zicha

18. Pahomije of Vranje

19. Jovan of Sumadija

20. Fotije of Dalmatia

21. Hrizostom of Bihac and Petrovac

22. Joanikije of Niksic and Budimlje

23. Milutin of Valjevo

24. David of Krusevac

25. Jovan of Slavonija

26. Ilarion of Timok

From the Church of Cyprus

27. Athanasios of Limassol

28. Neophytos of Morphou

29. Nicholas of Amathus

30. Epiphanios of Ledra

From the Church of Greece

31. Chrysostomos of Peristerion

32. Hierotheos of Nafpaktos and Aghios Vlasios

33. Anthimos of Alexandroupolis

Tagged In: Council, Ecumenism